Petrochemical and Chemical
Update
October 2004
Table of Contents
Petrochemical and Chemical
Ethanol Projects
GAIL
to Expand Petrochemical Complex at Pata in Uttar Pradesh
State-run GAIL (India) Ltd
announced it would invest Rs 650 crore on expansion of its petrochemical complex
at Pata in Uttar Pradesh to achieve economies of scale besides strengthening its
overseas portfolio.
"We would be investing Rs 650 crore in the next 30 months for expansion of our petrochemical plant to reduce average cost of production due to economy's of scale," GAIL Director Finance J K Jain told at the companies 22nd Annual General Meeting.
GAIL is also exploring business
opportunities in the petrochemical business in Kerala and Eastern India. GAIL is
looking at Kerala for investment in projects like R-LNG marketing and
distribution through pipelines from the proposed LNG terminal at Kochi,
compressed natural gas (CNG) and piped natural gas (PNG) network and a
petrochemical plant project in Kasargod district.
The Kasargod plant could be
useful in meeting the growing demand for polymers in the southern region. The
company plans to expand its petrochemical plant in two phases.
In the first phase, it has
de-bottlenecked its petrochemical plant to raise polyethylene production
capacity from 160,000 tonnes per annum (TPA) to 2,10,0000 TPA.
In the second stage of
expansion, the ethylene capacity will be increased from 3,000,000 TPA to
4,40,000 TPA by increasing the number of cracker furnaces from four to five and
the HDPE capacity from 1,00,000 TPA to 2,00,000 TPA.
GAIL Ltd is exploring business
opportunities in the Central Asian Republics, Turkey and some African countries.
Gail has taken equity stake in
Fayum Gas and Shell CNG in Egypt and also received the first dividend for
2003-04 from Fayum Gas. It has recently bought 15 percent stake in NatGas in
Egypt. At present, the company is targeting Myanmar, Bangladesh, Iran, Egypt and
the Philippines as possible destinations for investment.
Technip Recently Awarded Projects in China
Technip recently was awarded two petrochemical projects in China: one for the modernization of 6 cracking furnaces for PetroChina Jilin Petrochemical Company and the other one for the construction of 3 cracking furnaces for PetroChina LiaoYang Petrochemical Company.
For both projects, Technip's
engineering center based in Zoetermeer (Netherlands) will provide engineering
package and review/advisory services for detailed engineering and
construction/start-up phase and also the Technip's GK6 technology.
The GK6 technology improves the
ethylene production of the furnaces by 35 percent compared to the original
capacity. This increase in capacity is achieved by replacing the existing coil.
Moreover, this technology allows the furnace to operate on a range of feedstocks
from naphtha to heavy oils, with high selectivity and long on-stream time.
To-date, Technip's GK6 technology has been applied for the modernization of over
100 furnaces in the last seven years.
At present, China has seven
ethylene plants in operation. All the original furnaces of six of the seven
plants have been modernized using Technip's GK6 technology. Thanks to these
revampings, the country's overall ethylene capacity based on the GK6 technology
now stands at 3 million tons per year.
A major player in the field of
ethylene, Technip's share of the global market for cracking furnaces is becoming
more and more significant. Technip is also one of the only world-class groups
capable of taking on complete responsibility — from conceptual design to turnkey
design and construction — of ethylene plants based on its proprietary
technology.
With a workforce of about 19,000
persons, Technip ranks among the top five corporations in the field of oil, gas
and petrochemical engineering, construction and services. Headquartered in
Paris, the Group is listed in New York and Paris. The Group's main engineering
and business centers are located in France, Italy, Germany, the UK, Norway,
Finland, the Netherlands, the United States, Brazil, Abu-Dhabi, China, India,
Malaysia and Australia. The Group has high-quality industrial and construction
facilities in France, Brazil, the UK, the US, Finland and Angola as well as a
world-class fleet of offshore construction vessels.
Vinythai PCL in Thailand Expanding its Plastic Resin Production Facilities
Vinythai PCL (VNT.TH), a Thai affiliate of Belgian chemical
conglomerate Solvay S.A. (SOLB.BT), is considering expanding its plastic resin
production facilities to meet rising product demand in the region.
We're finalizing the feasibility study on the project (to
expand the facilities) and we hope to make a decision before the end of the
year," Managing Director Vincent De Cuyper told Dow Jones Newswires recently.
Since Vinythai's finances are improving, it can start
thinking about increasing its capacity for the future, De Cuyper said. However,
he declined to disclose the size of the planned investment.
The expansion plan aims to fulfill growing demand locally
and abroad for polyvinyl chloride, or PVC, De Cuyper said.
PVC is widely used in automotive parts, construction
materials, consumer goods and packaging.
If Thailand's second-largest PVC maker makes a decision this year to proceed with the plan, the new plant will begin operations at the end of 2006 at the earliest, De Cuyper said.
The plant will take about two years to be completed.
"Even though the new plant will be ready a little late (in
reaping the peak cycle of petrochemical prices), it's still reasonable" to
proceed with the plan, he said.
De Cuyper expects the low end of the PVC price cycle to
start in 2008. The average PVC price this year is expected to be around $770 a
ton. The current price is about $1,000 a ton.
Vinythai's PVC plant is currently operating at a full
capacity of about 200,000 metric tons a year.
Its manufacturing unit, which makes vinyl chloride monomer,
or VCM, a raw material used to produce PVC, will have a capacity of 200,000 tons
a year in April next year after debottlenecking. It now has a capacity of
195,000 tons a year.
Current domestic demand for PVC is around 450,000 tons a
year, with an annual growth of 6 percent.
Japan Energy Corp to Build Paraxylene Facilities in 2006 at either the Kashima or Chita Refinery
Japan Energy Corp is expanding its petrochemical products
division in response to rising profit margins from higher prices and growing
demand in China.
By fiscal 2006, the petroleum wholesaler aims to augment its production
facilities for base chemicals used in making synthetic fibers. It intends to
build paraxylene facilities in 2006 at either the Kashima or Chita refinery,
with details such as projected capital outlays to be decided during the current
fiscal year. The new facilities will increase company wide paraxylene capacity
by 70 percent to around 1 million tons a year.
The firm recently spent about 1 billion yen (US$8.98 million) to add production
lines for cyclohexane at the Chita refinery, increasing capacity there 80
percent to 220,000 tons annually.
Through the expansion, Japan Energy plans to raise its annual output capacity
for chemicals known as aromatics by 50 percent to 1.5 million tons a year. The
additional output will be exported to China and Southeast Asia.
Potash Corporation Announced an 82,000 Tonne Expansion of Prosphoric Acid Plant
Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. (PotashCorp) announced an 82,000 tonne expansion of its purified phosphoric acid plant at Aurora, NC. The $73.0 million expansion will increase the company's total annual purified acid capacity to 327,000 tonnes and is expected to be fully operational by the second quarter of 2006.
This expansion will not increase the company's overall capacity in phosphoric acid (P2O5), which is the key ingredient in purified acid. Rather, PotashCorp will be redirecting its existing P2O5 capacity to higher-margin products sold to industrial customers in North America. Historically, these products have provided a significantly higher gross margin than phosphate fertilizers. This expansion will accommodate growing demand in both North and South America.
With this expansion, PotashCorp will continue to capitalize on its competitive advantages in purified phosphoric acid production. Foremost of these is the company's access to high-quality rock in North Carolina with fewer impurities, resulting in superior product quality. The close proximity of this ore body to the Aurora processing facility and the vertical integration of the Aurora phosphate complex also bring inherent cost savings to the process. When the expansion is complete, the plant (already the world's largest and lowest-cost producer) will be even larger and more efficient.
"This investment furthers our decommoditization strategy for our phosphate business into higher-margin products," stated Bill Doyle, President and CEO. "We have a defined and distinct advantage in this area and with our advanced production technology and 15 years of operating experience, we believe we can bring further value to our customers."
Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. is the world's largest fertilizer enterprise producing the three primary plant nutrients and a leading supplier to three distinct market categories: agriculture, with the largest capacity in the world in potash, fourth largest in phosphate and third largest in nitrogen; animal nutrition, with the world's largest capacity in phosphate feed ingredients; and industrial chemicals, as the largest global producer of industrial nitrogen products and one of only three North American suppliers of industrial phosphates.
Indian Petrochemicals Corporation
Ltd (IPCL) to Build Ethylene Plant by 2008
Eng. Mohammad Bin Hamad Al Madi, deputy
chairman of the board of directors and executive president of Saudi Basic
Industries Corporation (SABIC), expressed satisfaction over the current
operation of the company's factories, with full production power and readiness
for future projects, in addition to abiding by environmental and hygienic
regulations to the highest standards. Al Madi also revealed that the company now
has several new projects in Yanbu; one of them is the setting up of a giant
company, which is already underway. This company will be one of the largest
Petrochemical complexes in the area. An engineering company has been given
contracts for implementing the gigantic project at a cost of about SR 10
billion. This company will specialize in ethylene, polyethylene and glycols
ethylene, with the capacity to produce a total of 3.8 million metric tons
annually and production is estimated to begin by the year 2008.
Al Madi also said that, currently in Europe, comprehensive engineering studies
are being carried out on new expansions, and these expansions will be
implemented in accordance with the economic feasibility. SABIC is also holding
discussions with the Dutch government about the new rules regarding foreign
investments and tax regulations in the Netherlands.
In fact, SABIC's European projects are in full production and have yielded huge
profits. The company depends on Naphtha, which has gone up in price since the
increase of crude oil prices which has affected the European economy. SABIC's
Riyadh branch earned profits from the rise in Naphtha prices, which in the end
created a working balance.
Muhammad Al Madi also revealed the planned expansion of the company in the 'Razi'
area, and setting up of the Razi 5 factory, a huge project which is estimated to
start operations by the third quarter of 2007, with an annual productive
capacity of 1.7 million tons, making it the largest factory of its kind in the
world. Al Razi is in fact one of the largest factory complexes for the
production of methanol at the international level.
IPCL Planning to Build MEG
Plant at Gandhar
Reliance-owned IPCL, the pioneering petrochemical company in India is
the largest producer of ethylene (830,000 mta) and polyethylene (540,000) in the
country. It mainly produces polymers, fiber and fiber intermediaries and
chemicals.
The IPCL stock is being driven by corporate developments, with the company planning to build the world's biggest MEG plant at Gandhar in Bharuch District, Gurajat with a capacity of 500,000 tonne per year at an investment of Rs 10 billion.
IPCL is also planning expansion of chlor-alkali plant by 25 per cent to 1,70,000 tonne per year of caustic soda and capacity creeps in the EDC and VCM plants by 15 percent.
IPCL proposes to invest the money in changing gas crackers at two of its petrochemical complexes Gandhar in Gujarat and Nagothane in Maharashtra to multi-feed crackers. The shift to a multi-feed cracker is of paramount importance as IPCL has been finding it difficult to source the requisite quantity of gas for achieving capacity optimization.
KFH Bahrain Starts $1.3 Billion Combined
Petrochemical-Energy Complex
KFH Bahrain implements US$1.3 billion combined petrochemical-energy complex
in Bahrain. This project represents the first of its kind to be undertaken in
the region.
Successful feasibility studies on the US$1.3 billion project were carried out in
conjunction with a word-class consortium consisting of partners such as General
Electric (GE) Energy, Weir International and Stone & Webster and in cooperation
with Uhde GmbH and Chicago Bridge & Iron Company — global leaders in their
respective areas.
The project will be financed through a combination of equity and debt of US$400
million and US$900 million, respectively, which the Bank will commence in
arranging following the obtaining of the required licenses and preparation of
the private placement memorandum.
The integrated nature of this world-class complex, which will be designed
according to the highest international safety and environmental standards and
using the latest technologies, is aimed at ensuring maximum efficiency and cost
effectiveness. The planned facility will be capable of providing total power
capacity of 1,000MW per hour and 30 million gallons of water per day while
simultaneously producing six key petrochemical products. These include: 315,000
metric tonnes of Ethylene Dichloride (EDC), 500,000 metric tonnes of Caustic
Soda, 167,000 metric tonnes of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) and 44,000 metric
tonnes per annum of Gasoline Stream in addition to some quantities of Hydrogen
and Sulphur. Approximately 255 million standard cubic feet per day of natural
gas will be required to operate the complex at full capacity.
The project is aimed at meeting ever-increasing demands for power and potable
water in Bahrain. For example, every year, additional power required in the
Kingdom is estimated at 150/200MW per hour and, while current projects are
expected to meet near-term shortages, they are not expected to sufficiently meet
long-term requirements in the Kingdom. Demands on potable water are similarly
high and expected to continue to increase at a significant rate going forward.
Further this project is expected to support the Kingdom's broader economic goals
of achieving greater diversification of the economy and downstream development
through the expansion of the petrochemicals sector and the creation of numerous
opportunities.
At its peak development phase, the onsite labor force is anticipated to be
approximately 3,500 laborers in addition to the creation of 500 new jobs on an
ongoing basis.
Export opportunities will also be significant for the high-demand petrochemicals
to be produced at the complex and the Bank is already engaged in discussions
with a number of reputable off-takers supplying markets such as China, India,
Japan, Australia and other international markets.
According to Mr. Abdulhakeem Alkhayyat, General Manager of KFH-Bahrain, ' We are
pleased to announce our sponsorship and support of this important and innovative
project. It is the mission of KFH-Bahrain not only to provide financial backing
for projects that support real growth in the local and regional economies, but
to conceptualize and then develop such projects as we have done here. This is a
unique project and a compelling investment opportunity, which we intend to
maximize for the benefit of the Bahrain economy and our stakeholders.'
A suitable location for the project will shortly be finalized with the Ministry
of Industry of the Kingdom of Bahrain and the project is expected to be
completed by the first quarter of 2008.
Mr. Osama Al Khaja, Head of Corporate Finance of KFH-Bahrain added, 'This
groundbreaking project will substantially contribute to Bahrain's downstream
development and produce numerous infrastructural and economic benefits for the
Kingdom as well as local and international companies. With the support and
participation of world-class partners, we look forward to moving ahead with the
next phase of this first of a kind regional project.'
NOVA Chemicals Corporation and Pemex Petroquimica in Feasibility Study for World-Scale Ethylene and Polyethylene Complex in Mexico
NOVA Chemicals Corporation confirmed it has been selected by Pemex Petroquimica (Pemex) as a partner in a feasibility study for a potential world-scale ethylene and polyethylene complex in Mexico.
This confirmation follows a recent announcement by Pemex, which has named NOVA Chemicals and two Mexican companies, Grupo Idesa and Indelpro, as its strategic joint-venture partners in the proposed ethylene-based petrochemicals and plastics complex known as Project Phoenix. The partners have committed to a feasibility study that aims to confirm the project will deliver a globally competitive ethylene cracker and key derivatives, initially including two world-class polyethylene plants.
"We are pleased to be selected by Pemex as a partner for what could be a truly outstanding chemicals and plastics complex," said Jeffrey M. Lipton, President and CEO of NOVA Chemicals. "We believe that this proposed complex has all of the ingredients to be the next logical supply increment for the North and South American ethylene/polyethylene markets. We expect to develop a world-scale facility that is globally cost competitive, will produce a wide range of high quality products and will target start up in 2009 or 2010, depending on market conditions."
Initial assessments by NOVA Chemicals indicate potential for the proposed complex to achieve a competitive position that equals or exceeds that of the company's cost-advantaged Alberta, Canada, facilities. A Mexican complex will benefit from access to advantaged feedstocks, a strong and growing domestic polyethylene market, and broad market access through the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and potentially the Mercosur trade agreement. NOVA Chemicals was selected to participate in the joint-venture study because of its proven success in the design, construction and operation of advantaged assets in Canada, its proprietary catalyst and Advanced SCLAIRTECH™ polyethylene technology, as well as its marketing expertise.
Showa Denko K.K. Will
Produce High-Purity Ammonia in Taiwan
Showa Denko K.K. has decided to start
producing high-purity ammonia in Taiwan starting in May 2005 through a new
subsidiary that will build a 1,000-ton-a-year plant at Tainan.
High-purity ammonia is increasingly used in the production of gallium-nitride
light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and laser/electronic devices, and of semiconductors
and liquid crystal displays (LCDs). (Ammonia serves as a nitrogen source in the
former application and as a nitride-film-forming gas in the latter).
World demand for high-purity ammonia is expected to increase from around 3,000
tons in 2004 to 6,000 tons by 2008, due to sharp increases in demand in Japan,
Taiwan and South Korea. Specifically, demand for use in LCD production is
forecast to increase at an annual rate of 20-25 percent, centering on Taiwan and
South Korea, while demand for use in LED production will grow at 10 percent or
more, mainly in Japan and Taiwan.
SDK is already producing approximately 1,000 tons a year of high-purity ammonia
in Kawasaki, Japan. The majority of the output is being exported to Taiwan,
where SDK has a market share of about 50 percent.
To meet further growth in demand for high-purity ammonia in Taiwan centering on
LCD applications, SDK will establish this month a new subsidiary named Taiwan
Showa Chemicals Manufacturing Co., Ltd. The new company, to be capitalized at
NT$70 million (approx. Y228 million), will have its head office in Taipei and
build its plant in Tainan. SDK will own 80 percent of the company while Young
Sun Chemtrade Co., Ltd., and Showa Specialty Gas (Taiwan) Co., Ltd., will own 10
percent each. The new company will adopt SDK's purification technology and
quality control system to provide high-quality product and services and ensure
competitiveness of the operation.
Royal Dutch/Shell Group is Studying the Feasibility of Building a Petrochemical Plant in Qatar
Royal Dutch/Shell Group agreed to consider building a chemical plant in Qatar that would help convert the nation’s natural gas reserves, the world’s third-largest, and produce ethylene, used in an array of products from antifreeze to solvents, said Abdullah bin Hamad al-Attiyah in Abu Dhabi.
Shell, in partnership with Qatar Petroleum, is studying the feasibility of building a processing plant to take ethane out of gas produced from Qatar's North field, the world's largest, and produce ethylene, used in an array of products from antifreeze to solvents, said Abdullah bin Hamad al-Attiyah in Abu Dhabi.
”We are talking to them about building a big petrochemical plant,'' al-Attiyah told reporters. ”It's a natural progression as the ethane will be supplied as a byproduct from the gas-to-liquids plant they are building'' in Qatar, he said. The Gulf state aims to develop a petrochemical industry that may rival Saudi Arabia, the region's largest chemical producer, he said.
Shell, Europe's second-largest oil company, agreed last year to spend $5 billion on a project in Qatar to convert gas into diesel and other fuels, which is almost 10 times bigger than any other such plant now existing.
BASF Building Chemical Plant in Nanjing and Caojing
BASF AG Chief Executive, Juergen Hambrecht, said he expects plants slated to start operations next year in China to boost sales in Asia.
A $2.9 billion complex in Nanjing, China, and a $1 billion plant in Caojing will enable BASF to “significantly” increase sales in China by the end of the decade from 1.6 billion euros ($2 billion) last year, Hambrecht, said in an interview.
“These are giant investments — together worth more than $3 billion — and many products will come out of it,'' Hambrecht said in Berlin. “For all of Asia, we intend to raise the share of sales from 13 percent today to 20 percent in 2010, and we will accomplish this.”
BASF, the world's largest chemical maker, expects China to become the second-biggest chemical market by 2015 as the number of consumers with annual purchasing power of $10,000 or more rises more than ninefold to 700 million from 76 million in 2001. The Ludwigshafen, Germany-based company is spending 2 billion euros on plants in China between 2001 and 2005.
The company is building the Nanjing complex in a venture with Chinese oil company Sinopec Group, and the Caojing plant with Huntsman Corp. and Chinese partners. The plants will produce about 1.7 million tons of chemicals a year, mostly for the Chinese market, Hambrecht said.
“BASF is well placed to benefit from the upstream chemical momentum in this region, with the only downside being the 2005 financial effect of the Nanjing ‘Verbund’ site startup,” Commerzbank analysts David Phillips and Peter Mackey wrote in an e-mailed note. The Nanjing plant will probably have startup costs of about 150 million euros, they said.
The Nanjing complex, the biggest project in BASF's history, is slated to be completed by the end of 2004 and start operating in the first half of 2005. The complex includes a cracker and nine other plants. The cracker uses heat and pressure to split naphtha, an oil derivative, into ethylene and polyethylene, which are used to make other chemicals and plastics.
The Caojing plant will make chemicals used to produce polyurethane for coatings and foam. BASF is building a second plant in Caojing, near Shanghai, at a cost of less than $300 million, to make chemicals used in elastic and Spandex.
The company's Chinese sales may rise as much as 10 percent this year on higher demand from carmakers and construction companies, Johnny Kwan, managing director of the China unit, said in June. BASF had about 7 percent of the chemical market in China in 2002.
BASF aims to make 70 percent of the chemicals it sells in the Asia Pacific region locally by 2010. The company had 2003 sales in the Asia Pacific region of 4.3 billion euros, based on the company’s location, or 13 percent of total revenue of 33.36 billion euros.
Huntsman to Build the World’s Largest Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) Facility in UK
Huntsman
has announced the go-ahead for plans to build the world’s largest low density
polyethylene (LDPE) manufacturing facility, on Teesside in the UK.
The 400,000 tonnes per year plant, Huntsman’s first venture into the growing
European polyethylene market, will be built at the Wilton International site at
a cost of around £200 million. The company anticipates the main plant will cost
approximately £180 million with a further £20 million covering logistics and
infrastructure.
It will create 117 permanent jobs and help underpin the future of the Huntsman
Cracker facility at Wilton and will also help to sustain a further 747 Huntsman
and contractor jobs at the company’s Aromatics business at North Tees and
Wilton.
Subject to the signing of a technology license agreement, the company expects to
begin construction in 2005, with the plant being operational in the third
quarter of 2007.
Huntsman’s decision to move ahead with the new facility is due in large part to
a grant of £16.5 million ($30 million) under the Regional Selective Assistance (RSA)
scheme from the UK Government, via the Department of Trade and Industry.
Mr. Huntsman commented: "Teesside is one of the most important of our global
locations and we are delighted that we will now enhance our presence here with
this large, world class polyethylene facility. It is good news for Huntsman, for
the economy of the Northeast and for the UK as a whole. We have worked hard to
make it a reality and the faith and confidence of the UK Government has been
very important to the process.
Tata Chemicals will Invest $450 to $500 Million
in Fertilizer Project in Bangladesh
Tata Chemicals managing director Prasad Menon said that the company
will invest $450 to $500 million in its proposed fertilizer project in
Bangladesh. “Out of the total $2 billon proposed investment by the Tata group in
Bangladesh, Tata Chemicals will be investing $450-500 million to set a urea
plant in Bangladesh.
Vietnam and China Building Urea Fertilizer
Plant in Ninh Binh Province
Vietnam and China have signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on the
building of an urea fertilizer plant in northern Ninh Binh province.
The US$400 million project has a capacity of more than a million tonnes of
fertilizer a year.
According to the MoU, the Vietnam Chemicals Corporation (VINACHEM), the
project's investor, will borrow $360 million from the Chinese government with an
interest rate of 2.5-3 percent a year for 15 years, including a grace period of
three years.
The feasibility study of the project, the biggest by VINACHEM, has been
submitted to Vietnam's prime minister for approval.
Once the Ninh Binh urea fertilizer plant is put into operation, VINACHEM will
supply an estimated 750,000 tonnes of urea, a nutrient-rich nitrogen fertilizer,
per year, meeting 30 percent of the agricultural sector's demand.
Incitec Pivot Considering $600 Million
Fertilizer Plant in Brunei
Incitec Tivot Ltd., Australia’s biggest
fertilizer company, joined with Mitsubishi Corp. and WestSide Ltd. to study
building a $600 million fertilizer plant in Brunei as prices for the crop
nutrients surge.
The plant would have the capacity to produce 1.23 million metric tons of urea a year, making it the largest in Asia, Incitec Pivot said in a statement. The Melbourne-based company would operate the plant and have the right to sell the majority of its production.
Spot prices for urea, the biggest source of nitrogen used in agriculture, have doubled in the past two years as natural gas prices have climbed. One unit of gas is needed to make three units of urea. Brunei, Southeast Asia's third-largest natural gas producer, would provide an abundant supply of the fuel and proximity to Australia, the world's No. 2 wheat exporter.
“The venture would have to have some drive from a natural gas cost point of view” to locate the project in Brunei, said John King, a Bangkok-based petrochemicals consultant at Nexant Inc. “Locations in Australia may require a lot of infrastructure development compared with locations in Brunei.”
Tokyo-based Mitsubishi, Japan's biggest trading company, owns a quarter of Brunei LNG Sdn., the country's only LNG supplier. WestSide Ltd. is the original proponent of the project. The closely held company's Indonesian subsidiary trades fertilizer in Asia and the company has links with ammonia and urea buyers on the West Coast of the U.S., Incitec Pivot said.
A fertilizer-processing facility in Brunei would also help the country reduce its reliance on oil and gas, which contribute more than 80 percent of export revenue. It would increase Brunei's sales abroad by about $150 million a year, Incitec Pivot said. Pittsburgh-based Alcoa Inc. last year agreed to study building a gas-fired aluminum plant in Brunei.
The urea plant would take about three years to build and create 200 jobs, Incitec Pivot said in the statement, which was sent to the Australian Stock Exchange. Its location in Brunei would enable it to supply buyers in Asia, the U.S. West Coast and Australia, it said.
“If the project proves viable it will fit comfortably with our strategy of being a world-competitive fertilizer supplier into the Australian market,” said Greg Witcombe, Incitec Pivot's managing director.
Shares of Incitec Pivot, which is 70 percent-owned by Orica Ltd., closed unchanged at A$19.00 on the exchange. They have gained more than a fifth this year.
The company joins Burrup Fertilizers Ltd., a unit of India's Oswal Group, and Plenty River Corp. in seeking to tap Australia's $2.2 billion fertilizer market. Australia uses about 1.5 million tons of urea a year. Incitec Pivot is currently the country’s only domestic supplier of the fertilizer, making 250,000 tons annually. The remainder is imported, mainly from the Middle East, Incitec Pivot said.
The National Petrochemical
Industries Co. to Build $1 Billion Polyethylene Plant
The National Petrochemical Industries Co.
intends to establish a new industrial project for the production of
polyethylene, at a cost estimated to be $1 billion, with participation of Saudi
and foreign investors and businessmen.
The project is to be implemented and completed within the next three years. An
agreement has been reached with Saudi Aramco for the provision and supply of
necessary raw material required for production in the factory. The new project
is expected to generate a number of jobs for Saudi young men, in addition to the
infusion of modern and the latest technology and international expertise.
The factory's product, polyethylene, is utilized in a number of industries such
as manufacture of carpets, packing material and bags. Another petrochemical, to
be produced by the factory will be polypropylene, which is a multi-purpose hot
plastic material, used in the production of many products, in different
industries. Its many uses include food packing, food and drink cartons,
children's toys, ropes, bags, household appliances, luggage and textiles. It is
also used in the manufacture of some internal automobile parts.
Polypropylene has proved itself to be highly in demand in the local and
international markets, due to its varied usage and applications. It is also
popular among manufacturers because of its strength and resistance properties
against rust and heat, in addition to its environment friendly properties. It is
recyclable and can be used freely without fear of environmental pollution.
The company's first project, the Saudi Olefin Co. Ltd. plant for the production
of propylene and polypropylene has already come on stream in Jubail, total
investments in which amount to SR 2 billion. The National Petrochemical
Industries Co. owns 75 percent of Saudi Olefin Co. Ltd. while 25 percent is
owned by the foreign investor, Basil Holding Co.
Ethanol Projects
Lena Michigan Plant Sued to Install Ethanol Projects
Citizens say the Lena plant spews foul-smelling emissions.
Last spring, they and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency sued the
plant for violating the U.S. Clean Air Act.
Many of the 78 ethanol plants currently operating in the United States, like the
Monroe plant, have positive records.
“We’re darned happy to note that our justifiable worries have come to naught,”
the Monroe Times said in a newspaper editorial praising the ethanol plant built
on the edge of town. “The promises... have all added up to success.”
Others, like the Lena plant, have burdened their communities.
“I didn’t oppose this plant until after it began operating,’’ says Lena activist
Heidi Thorp. “Knowing what I know now, I’d try to stop it from starting.’’
Whether an ethanol plant functions well or not seems to depend primarily on two
factors: the quality of the pollution-control technology and the competence of
the operator.
In Monroe, those two factors have been positive. In Lena, until recently, they
have been negative.
Penn-Mar Ethanol Has Proposed to Build a Large
Ethanol Plant — the First in the East — in Lancaster County
But first it must persuade this community that it will run
an operation like Monroe’s, not Lena’s.
Penn-Mar has applied for local and state permits to run a 60-million-gallon
production plant along the Susquehanna River in Conoy Township, three miles
northwest of Marietta. The township will hold the first of three public hearings
on that plan shortly.
The company says it will employ the “best-available technology’’ in the plant
planned for a site 1,000 feet from the river.
The plant will turn corn into ethanol — an additive used by gasoline refiners to
comply with the Clean Air Act. Many of Penn-Mar’s investors are corn farmers
from Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware who hope to sell grain to the plant.
The project’s builder, Lurgi PSI of Memphis, TN, and the engineer of its
fermentation system, ICM Inc. of Colwich, KS., have developed several other
ethanol plants.
If successful in the permitting process, Penn-Mar plans to begin manufacturing
ethanol by the summer of 2006. Then, says project manager Scott Welsh, “the
burden will be on us to continue to operate the plant appropriately.’’
A local citizens’ group, Stop the Ethanol Plant (STEP), questions whether
Penn-Mar can build and operate the plant without disrupting the neighborhood and
has called on Conoy Township to reject the proposal.
Based on ethanol plant operations elsewhere, the quality of air-cleaning
technology installed in an ethanol plant makes all the difference in whether it
is a good or bad neighbor.
Most ethanol plants of the first generation — those that began operating before
2002 — violated the Clean Air Act and emitted foul odors that could be smelled
for miles around.
That began to change after environmental officials cracked down on the Gopher
State ethanol plant in downtown St. Paul, MN, criticized for causing odors and
sickness.
In October 2002, the EPA ordered Gopher State and 11 other Minnesota plants, and
eventually all others nationwide, to install state-of-the-art emissions
controls.
State-of-the-art controls, then and now, are thermal oxidizers, devices that
burn and destroy organic fumes. These expensive mechanisms remove 98 percent of
all air pollutants, according to Cary Secrest of the enforcement division of EPA
in Washington.
Most ethanol plants updated their technology and survived. Some, notably Gopher
State, tried to improve but failed. Gopher State went bankrupt and closed down
early this year.
Aware that the EPA was considering imposing stricter emissions rules, operators
at Badger State Ethanol in Monroe chose to install a thermal oxidizer before it
was mandated. The plant went on line two years ago this month and has run
without incident.
Representatives of Penn-Mar Ethanol and Conoy Township officials visited Badger
State last year. They liked what they saw. Penn-Mar patterned its proposal for
the Susquehanna site on Monroe.
“Monroe and Lena started up at a time when plants were starting to put the
thermal oxidizers in but they weren’t required yet,’’ says Welsh. “Monroe said
proactively that they were putting the thermal oxidizer in and Lena did not.’’
Adkins Energy’s Lena plant began operating about two months before Badger State
in Monroe. After attempting to function for months without a thermal oxidizer,
Lena recently installed one. Results of new air-quality tests are not in yet.
Heidi Thorp, a leader of the citizen’s group suing Adkins, is not sure she will
trust them.
“When this plant came here, they told us it wouldn’t have any odor or
emissions,’’ she says. “They said they would put in a thermal oxidizer but
didn’t. They made it up.’’
Gary Kramer, Badger State Ethanol’s plant manager, is in a unique position to
judge the quality of both plants. He chaired the board at the Lena plant until
four years ago, when he discovered that other company officials planned to cut
corners on operations. He quit and went to work at Monroe, but he still lives in
Lena.
“Down at Lena they made a terrible mistake from not recognizing the need for a
thermal oxidizer,’’ Kramer says. “We felt here that we couldn’t take the
chance.’’
That decision has paid big dividends. Neighbors are at ease with the Monroe
plant. Measured air pollution is small. Kramer says no one at a nursing home and
park 2,000 feet away has ever complained about odor or noise — both problems in
Lena.
The two plants are lighted 24 hours a day, but the Monroe plant put canopies on
its lights so they shine down. The Lena plant has no canopies. Kramer says his
hometown ethanol plant radiates an “orange glow’’ at night.
What about profitability?
Plant investors are making money in Monroe, but not in Lena, which has spent
more money installing up-to-date pollution controls than it would have spent to
put them in originally.
Farmers are making money in both places because the price of grain has risen and
the cost of transporting corn has declined.
There are plenty of other success stories in the ethanol industry.
The Midwest Grain Processors plant at Lakota in northern Iowa began production
with a thermal oxidizer two years ago. It plans to double its capacity to 100
million gallons a year.
Lee Smith, editor of the Fairmont Sentinel, across the border in Minnesota, says
no one complains about the Lakota plant.
“In this part of the country, everyone is excited whenever an ethanol plant is
opened,’’ Smith says. “They’re happy to see value added to the corn.’’
The Glacial Lakes plant in Watertown, SD, also uses a thermal oxidizer.
Watertown Public Opinion reporter Terry O’Keefe says there have been no
environmental complaints about Glacial Lakes or any of the other four ethanol
plants within 60 miles.
Elsewhere, though, problems continue. Neighbors of Michigan Ethanol in Caro, MI,
say a thermal oxidizer has not eliminated odors and the plant has caught fire
five times in two years.
Ron Woloshen and others have sued Michigan Ethanol and the village of Caro,
alleging multiple violations of pollution and zoning laws.
Woloshen says yellow grain dust coats the neighborhood and pollutes nearby Cass
River.
“When the plant was proposed, I did not oppose it,’’ says Woloshen. “I know we
need these things in our community. But for God’s sake, we have to do them
right.’’
DEP officials currently are examining Penn-Mar Ethanol’s proposal to assess
whether the company plans to do it right. Ron Davis, new source review chief for
DEP’s south central region, says under EPA regulations if Penn-Mar proves it can
control pollution, it will be considered a “minor’’ polluter and approved.
“We’re leaning to the fact that that (approval) is what would happen,’’ he says.
“The thermal oxidizers are the main control device, but they are proposing a
number of smaller things to help control emissions as well.’’
An ethanol plant in Pennsylvania faces stricter pollution controls than in the
Midwest, he notes, because current air quality here is worse than there.
Coshocton Ethanol Moving Forward in Ohio
Coshocton Ethanol, LLC will receive a 50 percent Job Creation Tax Credit for
a seven-year term to begin operations. The value of the tax credit will be
$249,131 over the term, and the company would be required to maintain operations
at the site for 14 years.
The tax credit will enable Baard, LLC to develop the operation that will utilize components of corn to produce ethanol. Ohio was in competition with Michigan and Indiana for the $79.3 million project, which is expected to create 41 jobs within the first three years of operation.
Great Lakes is Planning Plant in Michigan
Great Lakes Ethanol LLC has plans to construct a 50-million-gallon-a-year
facility in Riga Township.
Liquid Resources to Complete Ethanol Plant in Ohio
Liquid
Resources of Ohio said it will use expired beer and soda to make ethanol, a fuel
additive usually made from corn. The company acquired the final permits it
needed and expects to get its first shipment of raw materials in a few days.
Chief executive Tim Curtiss said he's still waiting for more equipment but he
expects to start making ethanol next month. It would be the state's first
ethanol plant in 25 years.
Although Ohio ranks second in ethanol use, it doesn't produce any. Two
years ago, lawmakers started awarding financial incentives to companies to
produce ethanol. The director of the Ohio Air Quality Development Authority said
fewer than ten have started projects.
Cascade Grain is Slating Ethanol Plant for
Longview, Washington
Cascade Grain hopes to have financing in place this year for a $230 million
ethanol plant, and to break ground in the spring.
American Synthetic Rubber to Install
Thermal Incinerator in Louisville
A control device planned for the region's largest source of cancer-causing
1,3-butadiene could sit idle for up to 36 days a year, according to a draft
permit.
While the time that the equipment might not be in operation concerns environmentalists, the "thermal oxidizer" planned for the American Synthetic Rubber Co. plant on Camp Ground Road in Rubbertown would be capable of destroying at least 99.5 percent of the butadiene that it processes.
And when the equipment is turned off, a backup system with an estimated efficiency of 98 percent will remove butadiene. That backup system — a flare stack — is what the company currently uses to burn emissions of the chemical.
These plans, designed to reduce the plant's butadiene emissions by as much as 51,000 pounds a year, are detailed in a 30-page draft construction permit released this week by the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District. The permit also establishes how the company must operate the equipment and ensure that it works properly.
The agency is seeking written comments on the permit through Oct. 14 and has scheduled an Oct. 20 public hearing. Company officials have been urging the district to approve the permit quickly so they can install the equipment next year.
One air pollution control board member, however, said it may be better to move more slowly.
Board member Carolyn Embry, who also tracks environmental issues for the American Lung Association of Kentucky, said she questions whether the proposed device is the best technology available, and whether the board should approve the construction permit before it knows more about how a pending citywide toxic air control plan might affect the company. "We need to make sure we aren't locked into something that may have unintended consequences," Embry said.
Art Williams, director of the air district, said the company would still fall under the toxic air control program, scheduled for board consideration starting next month. Williams has acknowledged, however, that companies that install the "best available" technology would be eligible for an exemption.
A senior official at American Synthetic Rubber said yesterday that he hopes that the pollution control device will meet any toxic air health standard imposed by the air board, but that he can't say because the district has not yet made public its package of proposed regulations.
"We anticipate that it (the device) is state of the art," said Ron Musgnug, executive director for environmental standards at the company.
Burn at 1,600 Degrees
Musgnug said the thermal oxidizer will burn butadiene and other chemicals from the plant at temperatures of up to 1,600 degrees. The burning will occur in enclosed chambers, where gases are retained long enough for greater destruction.
By comparison, the flare that burns butadiene atop the current stack is not as hot, and there's no chamber to ensure more complete burning before venting, he said.
The district's attention to American Synthetic Rubber follows a health-risk study completed last year that identified butadiene as the community's top toxic air concern. That study, conducted for the West Jefferson County Community Task Force, reported cumulative risks from long-term maximum exposure to 18 chemicals in Louisville air that were higher than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency had estimated for anywhere in the country.
Responding to pressure from activists and the air pollution control board, the company in May pledged to spend up to $3million to install the new control device and take other steps that together will cut its yearly butadiene emissions by 60,000 pounds. That's about half its 2003 emissions of the chemical.
`A vast improvement'
Environmentalists this week said that they were pleased that the company and air district are moving closer to installing the device.
"The installation of (this) control technology is a vast improvement over what they have now," said Wilma Subra, a Louisiana chemist and EPA advisory board member who assists local advocacy groups, including Rubbertown Emergency Action.
Subra contends that if the existing flare stack were 98 percent efficient — as the company and local regulators calculate — butadiene would not continue to be measured at local monitors at unacceptable levels.
One Louisville activist, however, said he doesn't understand why the air district would allow the device to be turned off for more than a month every year. "We'll certainly be challenging that," said Tim Duncan, a board member of Rubbertown Emergency Action, which has been advocating pollution cuts at 11 Rubbertown-area chemical plants.
Williams said he tried to reach a "reasonable" agreement with the company over how long the device may be shut down, such as for maintenance or repairs. If the company exceeds the limit it could be fined, he said.
"There's no plan to specifically shut it down for 36 days," added Lynn Mann, company spokeswoman.
Williams said the company currently sends "several millions of pounds" of butadiene to its flare stack. Even a small percentage increase in efficiency should add up to a significant cut in emissions, he noted.
Regarding the broader toxic air control program, Williams said recently that as many as 18 new regulations will be posted on the district's Web site for public review.
The proposed program, if approved by the air board, would require 173 Louisville companies to estimate what effect their emissions of 38 pollutants have on the health of neighbors.
If any of the industrial sites discovers unacceptable risk, it will have to show how it can reduce that risk to approved levels, or seek an exemption, according to a program outline.
Exemptions would be granted only after scrutiny by regulators following public comment.
St. Lawrence Cement Could be Forced to
Install RTO
The state Department of Environmental Conservation has determined that St.
Lawrence Cement's proposed $350 million Greenport project must undergo a full
environmental review and that several additional issues related to permits the
company needs to build the plant must be reviewed in trial-like hearings before
a panel of administrative law judges. Commissioner Crotty issued a
134-page Second Interim Decision on September 8, in which she discusses
additional issues to be adjudicated in hearings. The administrative law judges
presiding at the first round of hearings made specific recommendations on those
issues based on previous testimony from experts for both SLC and opposition
groups.
Both sides will have an opportunity to present witnesses or other evidence on
the issues during the hearings and to file legal briefs in support of their
positions.
The issues to be adjudicated are:
Oxidiers for Brookwood Laminating in Rhode Island
The State approved the installation of a thermal oxidizer at Brookwood Laminating in South Kingston.
Montana Fiber Board Plant Considering Biofilter for Formaldehyde Reduction
Plum Creek's medium density fiberboard plant in Columbia Falls emitted about 710,000 pounds of toxic chemicals in 2002 Company spokesperson, Kathy Budinick confirmed the numbers but qualified the report by saying the company does not actually monitor its emissions at the plant per se. The emission numbers are based on calculations
Budinick said there is a bio-filter
on one line of the MDF plant that's designed to reduce emissions and the company
is considering another filter on the other line, she said.
Plum Creek is permitted by the state for the MDF plant and it is required to
meet federal air quality standards. There isn't, however, an air quality
standard for formaldehyde or methanol and the state doesn't test for those
substances said Dan Walsh, air compliant section coordinator for the state. The
MDF plant was last permitted in 2003.
East Kansas Agri Energy to Double Ethanol Capacity
Three years after Anderson County farmers and business people first embraced the concept of building an ethanol plant, construction has begun — at nearly twice the scale initially proposed.
The Garnett plant, about 80 miles southwest of Kansas City, will be the seventh ethanol processing operation in the state and the first in southeast Kansas when it opens in mid-2005.
East Kansas Agri-Energy LLC, a small corporation created by farmers in October 2001, originally planned an operation that could produce 20 million gallons of ethanol a year for use in gasoline.
By January of this year, when the corporation announced it had raised the $16 million in seed money required by lenders, the design had been revised so the plant would produce 26 million gallons a year.
It has since grown again. Last week, on the eve of groundbreaking, investors voted for a 37 million gallon plant that would cost an extra $10 million to build, bringing the total cost to $47 million. The corporation's major lenders agreed to the larger design.
Engineers suggested the larger capacity after a study showed a plentiful regional supply of corn and milo, which are among the grains processed for ethanol.
"They said we could do that without too much impact on the plant," said Bill Pracht, a Westphalia farmer and rancher who chairs the board of East Kansas Agri-Energy. "It made sense."
Pracht noted that the additional capacity won't require a significantly larger payroll at the plant, about 32 employees, compared to the 30 that would be needed to run a plant producing 26 million gallons a year.
Construction is expected to continue through the winter if the contractor gets all the concrete poured during the fall, Pracht said.
McIlvaine Company,
Tel: 847-784-0012; Fax: 847-784-0061;
E-mail: editor@mcilvainecompany.com;
Web site: www.mcilvainecompany.com