![]()
Coronavirus
Technology Solutions
The Pandemic is
Like a Football
Game Where the
Head Covering is
a Life and Death
Decision
CATER 95 Mask
Suppliers Have a
Responsibility
to Provide Fit
Testing Advice
Hong Kong Masks
Performance
Evaluated
Ohio is
Installing Some
Devices Which
May Not Meet
Claims for COVID
Protection
_________________________________________________________________________
The Pandemic is
Like a Football
Game Where the
Head Covering is
a Life and Death
Decision
Most of
the
regulations
now
require wearing
of masks. But
this is like
saying every
football player
must wear a head
covering. The
difference is
that the risk of
death is much
greater by
wearing a less
protective mask
than it is a
less protective
helmet.
It is
therefore of
highest
importance to
wear an
efficient tight
fitting mask.
ASTM is taking a
big first step
by preparing to
create standards
based on 20% and
50% efficiency.
These proposed
standards
communicate the
important
parameters and
the methods by
which the level
of protection is
achieved. This
work and the
ASTM 50 rating
can be used for
what might be
called the ASTM
50 plus rating.
One of
the plus ratings
would be CATER
95.
It would
use all the
tools and
protocols set up
by ASTM but be
able to
demonstrate not
only the high
efficiency but
also the tight
fit with various
face sizes.
CDC could
provide
information on
reliable fit
testing
procedures for
public
masks. They can
include use of
the same
qualitative and
quantitative fit
testing
technologies
required for
industrial and
medical use.
But they
would also
provide advice
on frequency of
testing and
generic testing
by mask size.
CATER mask
suppliers with
five different
mask sizes are
in a better
position to
provide low
leakage masks
than are
suppliers with
just two sizes.
At one level
suppliers should
provide
leakage
results through
detailed testing
of each
different size
mask when
applied to
appropriate
face
sizes. This
should include
talking,
walking, bending
etc.
(Practical
Performance
Tests on sample
test subjects).
Most masks are
worn in such a
manner that air
leakage is as
much as 40% of
the total
exhaled. The
biggest
challenge will
be to create a
system which
keeps leakage
below 10%. If
both emitter and
recipient have
leakage limited
to 10 % the net
virus
transmission is
only 1%.
Rating of
net efficiency
(capture
efficiency less
leakage) will be
useful. There
are CATER 95
masks with 95%
efficiency and
an average of 4%
leakage for a
net efficiency
of 91%.
The concept of
CATER 95 bubbles
is being
proposed. If
everyone
entering this
bubble has a
CATER 95 or
better mask then
the school,
fitness center,
or office
building in the
bubble could
operate
normally.
It is proposed
that fit testing
for the public
be accomplished
by one of the
following
·
Existing
industrial fit
testing services
with mobile vans
or
on site
measurement
capabilities
·
New groups of
fit testers such
as physical
therapists at
fitness centers
·
Retail stores
who can sell
masks and
provide fitness
testing and
advice
·
Schools and
large
institutions
·
Local fit
testing centers
(could be the
fitness center
or retail store)
It is further
proposed that
there be
limitation of
entry to the
bubble based on
some sort of
proof (if only
visual) that the
individual is
wearing a
properly fitted
CATER 95 mask.
In the Alert
yesterday we
provided details
on the fitness
centers and how
they could
reopen and even
generate extra
revenue from fit
testing. We are
forecasting that
CATER Mask sales
will be greater
than gym shoes,
hoodies, or for
that matter any
other clothing
item.
So the
department store
with a shoe
section to help
customers obtain
the right shoes
could generate
more revenues by
helping people
choose the right
mask.
CATER 95 Mask
Suppliers Have a
Responsibility
to Provide Fit
Testing Advice
Consumer mask
manufacturers
should
provide
clear
instructions on
how to perform a
Self-Fit Test:
Here are the
instructions
provided by
Vogmask.
Place your fingers
on the
cheekbones and
thumbs on sides
of chin to do
inhale and
exhale fitting
check.
"General use
respirators are
not fit tested
in a Workplace
Safety Program,
so it is
recommended that
you self-check
how the mask
fits by this
method. In some
regulatory
regions, Vogmask
is fit tested on
human test
subjects to
confirm
filtering
efficiency under
a variety of
motions such as
walking, and
talking, head
side to side,
and head up and
down.
Hong Kong Masks
Performance
Evaluated
An evaluation of
masks available
in Hong Kong has
valuable
information but
misses the mark
because it
reports criteria
of value to a
surgeon who
wants to avoid
blood spurts but
does not address
the biggest
factor which is
mask air
leakage.
In tests on 30
models of
surgical masks
for sale in the
city, the
consumer
watchdog finds
all but one
meets basic
infection
prevention
standards
But 70
percent fall
short in other
measures
relating to
bacteria levels,
bodily fluid
resistance and
comfort.
The vast
majority of
surgical masks
on sale in Hong
Kong meet
minimum
standards for
protecting
against
infections, but
70 per cent of
models have
flaws in other
areas such as
hygiene and
durability,
according to a
Consumer Council
study.
The watchdog’s
findings,
released on
Tuesday as the
city battled
its fourth
wave of Covid-19,
revealed high
levels of
bacteria on some
disposable
masks, and one
type did not
reach basic
requirements for
resisting bodily
fluids.
The Consumer
Council oversaw
tests on 30
different types
of surgical,
single-use
masks.
Photo: Handout
Pharmacy chain
Watsons, owned
by city tycoon
Li Ka-shing, was
the most vocal
of those
disputing the
findings,
insisting its
masks attained
the highest
American
standards of
protection. The
firm said it
used the same
laboratory as
the one
commissioned by
the council to
perform the
tests but found
discrepancies
between both
sets of results.
All but one of
the 30 models of
single-use masks
that the council
tested reached
95 per cent or
above for average
bacterial
filtration
efficiency (BFE)
and particle
filtration
efficiency
(PFE).
By doing so they
were judged
satisfactory in
terms of
guarding against
infection,
reaching the
basic level one
requirement
under the
American ASTM
F2100 standard.
To obtain ASTM
level two or
three
certification,
which is the top
standard
available, BFE
and PFE readings
must hit at
least 98 per
cent.
The price of
each mask ranged
from HK$2 to
HK$9, with 18
marked as made
in Hong Kong,
eight in
mainland China,
and others from
Taiwan and
Vietnam.
The one model
found in the
study not to
reach level one
for countering
infections was
produced by
Perfetta, a
medical supplies
manufacturer
from Vietnam.
Its average PFE
was only 86.64
per cent,
failing to meet
ASTM level two
as claimed as
well as falling
far short of the
most basic
standard for
protective
efficacy.
Lui Wing-cheong,
vice-chairman of
the council’s
research and
testing
committee, said
in general the
masks sold in
the city should
be able to offer
basic protection
to consumers for
daily use.
However, he
warned that 70
per cent of the
models performed
poorly in other
tests.
For example,
three models
were detected
with relatively
high levels of
bioburden,
referring to the
number of
bacteria living
on a given
surface. The ear
straps of about
a third of the
models broke in
stress tests,
and one failed
to meet the
level one
resistance
requirement
against
penetration by
bodily fluid.
“The council
stresses that as
face masks are
crucial daily
necessities
against the
pandemic,
manufacturers
should strictly
monitor the
quality and
ensure all
important
information on
the labelling is
comprehensive
and accurate, so
as to ensure the
best protection
to consumers,”
he said.
The tests showed
the PFE readings
on all five
samples from
each of four
models were
lower than the
producers
claimed. Two of
those – from
Tempo as well
as Perfetta
– also had a
lower BFE than
they had stated.
However, Lui
noted instances
of blood or
bodily fluid
splashing on
masks were
relatively
rare in daily
life.
For hygiene
standards, the
study showed 90
per cent, or 27
models, met the
European Union
standard for
levels of
coliform
forming, which
is set at less
than 30 units
per gram.
The three models
failing in this
standard were
Artec Med, Pure
Living and
Powecom, which
recorded levels
under the
hygienic
indicator
ranging from
41.7 to above
159.4.
According to the
council, the
159.4 reading
from Powecom,
from China, also
exceeded the 100
limit of its
home country’s
“bacterial
detection
implement
standard”.
Ohio is
Installing Some
Devices Which
May Not Meet
Claims for COVID
Protection
But the CDC is
now warning that
some popular
products like
dry hydrogen
peroxide devices
and ionizers,
which are
popping up in
restaurants,
universities and
government
buildings around
Lima and many
cities in the
U.S., are still
unproven in
their ability to
reduce airborne
coronavirus
transmission,
while other
devices like
HEPA filters,
window fans or
even an open
window can
filter or push
contaminated air
outside. The CDC, which updated its ventilation guidance on Dec. 15, stopped short of saying the devices don’t work as marketed. But the agency did say that there is a lack of peer-reviewed scientific evidence to support manufacturer claims and that consumers should be cautious when purchasing devices that it classifies as emerging technologies.
For Dr. Michael
Bisesi, an
environmental
health scientist
and professor at
The Ohio State
University’s
College of
Public Health,
the primary
question is
whether the
devices are safe
and capable of
deactivating a
large enough
percentage of
airborne viruses
lingering in the
air to be
effective,
especially when
those devices
are used in
larger rooms
than the
manufacturer may
have intended.
The Titan 4000
Hydroxyl
Generator, for
example,
purports to
decompose air
pollutants into
carbon dioxide
and water by
forming a
reaction with
water and oxygen
in the air to
produce hydrogen
peroxide
molecules, which
are dispersed by
the machine’s
fan into the
room to purify
the air. The
company says its
product is safe
and is
classified by
the U.S. Food
and Drug
Administration
as a Type 2
medical device,
safe for use in
baby and
neonatal wards. Allen County purchased 36 of the hydroxyl generator units in November, and other local entities have followed suit.
In one
statement,
they’re saying
they don’t pose
a hazard to
occupants
because they’re
so reactive,
they react in
seconds,” Bisesi
said. “So, if
they’re so
reactive and
they react in
seconds, if you
have a portable
unit at one side
of the room and
it’s dispersing
air into the
room — are they
still in an
active form by
the time they
get to the other
side of the
room?”
Bisesi also
noted the
similarities
between the
hydroxyl
generator and
ozone
generators, a
once-popular
device that
produces ozone
gas to remove
air pollutants.
It has since
been found
to damage
lungs when
inhaled.
Both devices
disperse another
contaminant into
the room, Bisesi
said, which in
turn introduces
the potential
for respiratory
and eye
irritation,
whereas a HEPA
filter, one of
the
CDC-recommended
ventilation
strategies,
filters
contaminants out
of the air to
reduce
coronavirus and
other viral
transmission
indoors.
Titan’s
manufacturer
countered that
its generators
do not introduce
the potential
for contaminants
in the air, and
there is zero
potential for
respiratory or
eye irritation
because the
hydroxyl
generators were
designed to be a
safe alternative
to ozone
generators and
have been
approved by the
California Air
Resources Board.
The company
acknowledges it
hasn’t been
tested on
COVID-19 yet,
but testing is
scheduled for
early 2021.
“So, the
question is: is
it better to
release
something into
the air to help
the nature
deactivate the
virus,” Bisesi
asked. “Or, if
you could have
an equally
effective way
using HEPA
filters to
enhance the
filtration of
the air or
remove the
contaminant in
their air — I’m
in favor of
removing the
contaminant from
the air when
there’s
occupancy
Cross Fit is
Ambivalent on
Mask Protection
On the evening
of Nov. 20, two
sheriff’s
deputies and a
health inspector
entered a
facility in
Buffalo, New
York. The area
was under an
executive
order barring
nonessential
gatherings of
more than 10
people due to
the coronavirus pandemic,
but there
were roughly 100
people inside
the venue that
night.
At first, the
confrontation
was tense but
restrained. One
man yelled that
the officials
were on private
property and had
to leave, but
another man at
least tried to
seem persuasive.
“We’re asking to
appeal to your
compassionate
side,” he said
to the
officials.
Soon, though,
the crowd grew
angrier and
started
shouting: Where
is the deputies’
warrant? Why is
the health
inspector hiding
her name tag? If
I’m supposed to
be wearing a
mask, then why
don’t you arrest
me? Growing
rowdier still,
they began
chanting, “Get
out!” as they
pushed closer to
the officials,
who were inching
back toward the
door. The
furious crowd
followed them
out into the
parking lot and
hoarsely
screamed, “We
will not
comply!”
The scene of
this tense
standoff? A
CrossFit gym.
A video of the
incident went
viral, drawing
nearly a million
views. On Nov.
24, the gym’s
owner, Robby
Dinero, appeared
on Fox News,
ringed in the
background by
roughly 35
unmasked people,
including a few
small children.
He held up the
$15,000 fine
levied by the
Erie County
Department of
Health in front
of the camera.
“Our freedom
cannot end where
people’s fear
starts,” he said
before ripping
the document in
half.
In terms of
reach and
influence in the
fitness world,
CrossFit is
unparalleled.
With roughly
6,700 affiliate
gyms, the brand
has more
locations in the
United States
than Equinox,
SoulCycle, and
Orange Theory
combined. With
about the same
number
internationally,
CrossFit is
the largest
fitness chain in
the world.
But CrossFit is
also unique for
its hands-off
corporate
structure. To
open
an affiliate location,
a gym owner
needs only a
location, proof
of insurance,
the $3,000
annual licensing
fee, and a coach
with a “level 1
certification,”
which can be
done over a
weekend. Unlike
under a
franchise model,
CrossFit gyms
are largely free
to make their
own decisions
about branding,
equipment,
facilities,
coaches,
training
methodology,
programming
workouts, and
hygiene
practices.
As a result,
CrossFit is
divided on its
response to the
pandemic like no
other fitness
brand. The
company has
released no
public health
requirements for
affiliates in
part because of
a lingering
split in the
CrossFit
diaspora between
those who
believe in
science and
those who don’t.
To some
prominent
CrossFitters,
the relative
silence from
such an
influential
company has put
the community in
danger.
Florida Gyms
Look to
Expanding
Membership in
the New Year
There are
ultraviolet rays
integrated into
the children’s
play area of
Achieve and in
all of the
building’s
heating,
ventilation and
air conditioning
systems, and
social
distancing is
practiced in the
cardio equipment
areas and
classroom
sessions.
“We have about
20,000 square
feet of building
and every other
machine is shut
off currently,”
Glickman said.
“Everything
we’re doing is
to make sure our
members feel
safe, which is
why all of our
staff wear masks
and it’s why we
offer masks and
gloves to every
member that
comes in.”
Bailey’s Health
and Fitness in
Orange Park is
practicing
similar measures
with multiple
touchpoint
cleanings
throughout each
day, UV lights
installed in
HVAC systems and
more. It’s about
the safety of
the members and
providing the
means for them
to remain not
only safe, but
healthy through
fitness as well
for each of
these gyms.
“Maintaining a
healthy
lifestyle and
staying active
is even more
important during
this time,”
Dearolf said.
“We will
continue to
ensure a safe
and encouraging
environment to
help people
reach their
goals and
overcome
stress.”
New Jersey
Reports COVID
Cases at Schools
Over the past
week, seven new
confirmed
outbreaks of
in-school
transmission
were reported
statewide, Gov. Phil
Murphy said
Wednesday,
involving 31
additional cases
around the
state.
That brings the
statewide total
to 105 school
COVID-19
outbreaks
involving 459
students and
school staff
since schools
reopened in late
August,
according to the
governor. Those
new outbreaks
came out of five
counties —
Atlantic,
Bergen,
Monmouth, Ocean,
and Salem.
During that same
period, he said
the state
overall
registered
250,563 total
positive cases. “This means less than two-tenths of 1% of cases are traced to activity within our schools,” Murphy said during his latest coronavirus briefing in Trenton. Since the start of the academic year, the majority of our schools have been open in some capacity for in-person instruction, the governor added, whether it be fully in-person or through a hybrid-learning model.
“This is a very
stressful year,”
he said. “God
willing, we’ll
get back to some
sort of
normalcy, I hope
sooner rather
than later.” New Jersey defines a school outbreak as two or more confirmed COVID-19 cases involving students, teachers or school staff who contact tracers believe transmitted the virus to each other either in class or during the school day.
The outbreak
numbers do not
include cases
where students
or their
teachers tested
positive after
catching the
coronavirus
during sports
practices, from
family members,
at parties or
during other
non-school
activities.
The totals
include both
public and
private K-12
schools.
State health
officials have
withheld the
names of the
schools with
outbreaks,
citing the need
to protect the
privacy of
students and
school staff who
tested positive.
Where were this
week’s newly
reported school
outbreaks?
The largest of
numbers appear
to be in Bergen
County, where
three new school
outbreaks
involving 13 new
cases were
reported.
Monmouth had two
new outbreaks
with an
additional seven
cases.
The 105 school
outbreaks across
the state
reported to date
include:
·
Atlantic County: 5
school outbreaks
(total of 14
cases)
·
Bergen County: 21
school outbreaks
(total of 99
cases)
·
Burlington
County: 7
school outbreaks
(total of 24
cases)
·
Camden County: 13
school outbreaks
(total of 66
cases)
·
Cape May County: 8
school outbreaks
(total of 23
cases)
·
Cumberland
County: 3
school outbreaks
(total of 7
cases)
·
Gloucester
County: 6
school outbreaks
(total of 37
cases)
·
Hudson County: 2
school outbreaks
(total of 10
cases)
·
Hunterdon
County: 1
school outbreak
(3 cases)
·
Mercer County: 2
school outbreaks
(total of 12
cases)
·
Middlesex
County: 1
school outbreak
(3 cases)
·
Monmouth County: 6
school outbreaks
(total of 19
cases)
·
Ocean County: 5
school outbreaks
(total of 34
cases)
·
Passaic County: 4
school outbreaks
(total of 23
cases)
·
Salem County: 10
school outbreaks
(total of 37
cases)
·
Somerset County: 3
school outbreaks
(total of 9
cases)
·
Sussex County: 3
school outbreaks
(total of 7
cases)
·
Union County: 1
school outbreak
(23 cases)
·
Warren County: 4
school outbreaks
(total of 9
cases) Only Essex and Morris counties have had no confirmed school outbreaks, according to the statistics.
Both counties
are among the
largest in New
Jersey and have
numerous school
districts
offering
in-person
classes that
have closed
temporarily due
to multiple
COVID-19 cases.
However, none of
those cases have
been classified
as school
outbreaks
because contact
tracers have not
concluded
students and
school staff
caught the virus
at school. Will the governor shut down all schools again?
Murphy has said
the school
outbreak numbers
are relatively
low considering
the high number
of New Jersey
schools that
have reopened.
That data is
part of the
reason he has
said he is not
planning a
statewide
shutdown of
schools similar
to the executive
order he issued
last spring.
School districts
are deciding for
themselves
whether to offer
in-person
classes,
temporarily
switch to
all-remote
learning or
continue virtual
learning plans. Nine
of the state’s
ten largest
school districts
are currently
all-remote until
at least January
or February.
|