HOT TOPIC HOUR
ZLD
Options include Crystallization, Spray Drying, and Fixation
The webinar yesterday provided a valuable exchange of
information among ZLD system and component suppliers.
One of the goals was to compare evaporation/crystallization
to the spray drier for coal-fired power plants. All agreed that the comparison
needs to be site specific. In some cases the spray drier is less expensive than
the evaporation approach but the comparison was limited to FGD wastewater and
not the entire plant wastewater discharge.
The evaporator /crystallizer approaches for
Veolia,
GE,
Aquatech, Oasys
and several others were displayed. The spray dryer approach of
Mitsubishi/Advatech was
discussed and it was learned that B&W
and GE are now both offering
a spray drier system. The GE system is an
Alstom design which is slated
for startup soon at Iatan (Missouri).
The ZLD market is far larger than the $250 million/yr.
which is appearing in many articles.
China has thousands of coal-fired power plants and
coal-to-chemicals plants, which will employ ZLD at a cost of more than $10
billion.
Chinese power plants have some ZLD systems using
evaporators but are leaning toward the cheaper route of using flue gas to
evaporate liquid in the sludge.
The spray drier approach is being pushed by Mitsubishi,
URS, and other international
companies.
Coal-fired power plants can opt for calcium sulfite
scrubbing and chemical fixation of sludge rather than gypsum production and
wastewater treatment.
The latest intelligence is that local Chinese companies are
developing their own spray drier technologies and it is likely that this will be
the option adopted by most plants.
The market for ZLD for shale oil has not slowed as much as
anticipated due the rule of unintended consequences. Previously the salty
solution was reinjected into new holes. With fewer new holes the ZLD option has
blossomed.
The discussion was structured around a quick view of 100
power points filled with process flow diagrams and cost comparisons. This
decision guide is intended to help refineries, CTX, and other plant operators
make the best ZLD decisions. For coal-fired power plants there are three
options:
Evaporation and crystallization
Spray dryer with flue gas
Chemical fixation of high liquid containing sludge
Lime-based scrubbing systems without forced oxidation
create soupy sludge. When these sludges are mixed with lime they encapsulate
heavy metals and become non leachable landfill. The same approach can be
used with gypsum wash residue after filtration. Sargent
& Lundy analyzed a theoretical 500 MW plant and concluded that fixation
was the lowest net present value.
The energy consumption in the evaporation of wastewater is
an important component. Howden
discussed options including a turbo blower which is widely used for its
performance capabilities and energy economy.
Veolia has a process which uses high vacuum and allows
evaporation at lower temperatures. This process eliminates the need for
softening. Millions of dollars needed for chemicals and disposal are eliminated
even though the energy consumption of the system is somewhat higher.
A number of gas turbine combined cycle power plant are
using ZLD. The McIlvaine GTCC Supplier Program displays both existing systems
and new projects.