First of Three Webinars to assist PacifiCorp in Selection of NOx
Reduction Technology
7/14/16 at 11:00 a.m.
PacifiCorp
now has to install equipment to meet regional haze requirements impacting 4 x
350 MW coal-fired boilers in Utah. The company is investigating the possibility
of installing alternative technology rather than conventional SCR to meet the
0.06 lbs./MMBtu NOx target. The utility personnel have been utilizing
the McIlvaine Power Plant Air Quality Decisions (PPAQD) to help determine a
course of action. They have determined that a number of alternatives outlined in
PPAQD could be applicable.
PacifiCorp has assembled a very knowledgeable group of researchers and
consultants in this endeavor. There is some potential research funding available
to help them validate some of their conclusions as they move forward in the
decision process.
McIlvaine is providing free services to coal-fired power plants to help them
make air, water, combustion and other decisions. McIlvaine will be conducting
three webinars for PacifiCorp.
The first webinar on July 14 will identify the range of opportunities
with the goal of reducing in furnace NOx to 0.22-0.15 lbs/MMBtu and
then use back end technologies to reduce outlet emissions to 0.06 lbs./MMBtu.
The second webinar on July 19 will include in-furnace technologies such
as neural networks and combustion modifications to reach the 0.22-0.15
lbs./MMBtu NOx levels.
The third webinar on August 2 will explore ways to obtain the additional
reduction to .06-.07 lbs./ MMBtu NOx.
The webinars will be open to anyone. Already a large number of people designated
by PacifiCorp are registered. The format will be a review of information posted
in the PPAQD. McIlvaine welcomes contributions to the PPAQD prior to any of the
three webinars and then at any time in the future. Utilities and subscribers
have continuing access to the system and receive weekly Alerts relative to new
content.
PacifiCorp would prefer proven methods. However, McIlvaine contends that the
best solution may have been proven in some manner other than installation on
similar coal-fired power plants.
McIlvaine was president of Environeering in 1970 when it partnered
with United Engineers to provide an MgO sulfuric acid recovery
system to Philadelphia Electric. This system was based on
Environeering MgO systems already operating in pulp mills. The conditions were
identical and so it was not deemed necessary to conduct pilot plant studies. The
system was successful and followed by additional systems at other Philadelphia
Electric plants.
In 1965, Environeering partnered with Combustion Engineering to
develop limestone scrubbing for coal-fired power plants. A $ 25 million R&D
program resulted in the world’s first large scale demo plant (125 MW) at
Union Electric Merrimac Station in 1968. Even after all the R&D and
pilot work there were many unforeseen problems which developed in the scale up
from pilot to 125 MW. The contrast between the successful MgO installation and
the problem plagued first limestone installation can serve as a guide.
One option for PacifiCorp is to use SNCR and in duct SCR as has been applied by
LP Amina in coal-fired power plants in China and by Fuel Tech in
plants elsewhere. How identical are the conditions to these installations?
Catalytic filters from FLSmidth are now being sold for cement
plant applications. They use fiberglass bags with embedded catalyst. Several
other companies including W.L. Gore and Filtration Group also
offer catalytic filter elements. There are hundreds of installations in biomass,
glass, and small coal-fired boilers. Is there enough experience and are the
conditions similar enough to extrapolate bag life? There is some time for the
installation of some catalytic filter units in the existing baghouse to help
determine life expectancy.
LoTOx and Pernoxide are attractive because the cost per ton of NOx
removed is the same whether you are moving from 0-20 percent removal or 70-90
percent removal. DuPont has sold 30 LoTOx systems for refinery
catalytic cracking processes. Is this experience sufficient?
You can register for the three webinars at:
Click here to Register for the Webinars
Acid Gas Removal Needs will boost the 2020 Fabric Filter Market by 2020
The market for fabric filter systems in 2020 will be $8 billion. Seventy-five
percent of the applications will be just for particulate removal but 25 percent
will be for acid gas removal or for a combination of particulate and acid gas
removal. Fabric filters will take market share away from electrostatic
precipitators because of both higher particulate and acid gas removal abilities.
The coal-fired power industry has remained loyal to the electrostatic
precipitator until recently when regulations on SO2 and fine
particles forced consideration of alternatives. Reverse air cleaned fabric
filters were the first to be proven successful in power plant applications.
However, their use in acid gas removal is limited. The high solids content of
the combination of flyash and sodium or calcium sulfate is a challenge for this
type of cleaning mechanism but not for pulse jets. The pulse jet cleaned bag can
easily handle the high solids content. China, Italy, the U.S. and South Africa
are among the countries where power plants have invested heavily in fabric
filters for multiple pollutant removal.
Mercury control regulations in the U.S. have resulted in the increased use of
fabric filters with activated carbon injection for mercury capture by power
plants. China and the EU are considering regulations which are
similarly stringent. Many waste incineration plants in countries throughout the
world already employ fabric filters for dust, mercury and acid gas removal.
The use of fabric filters for acid gas control requires a review of bag cleaning
technology. The industry has adopted what in accounting terms would be LIFO
rather than FIFO. The goal has been to retain a base cake of the particles which
are first in. The particles which are last in are then pulsed off. Efficiency
and bag life are thus enhanced. However, the opposite is true when calcium oxide
is employed. The particles first in have already reacted to form sulfates. They
need to be removed. Reaction can then take place with the last in unreacted
calcium particles. McIlvaine believes that considerable benefits will be
achieved by fully investigating the LIFO options.
More information on
N021 World
Fabric Filter and Element Market
More information on
1ABC Fabric
Filter
Access to the Decision Guide on FIFO –LIFO bag cleaning options can be found at:
Utility E-Alert Tracks Billions of Dollars of New Coal-fired Power Plants on a
Weekly Basis
Here are some headlines from the Utility
E-Alert.
UTILITY E-ALERT
#1280 – July 8, 2016
Table of Contents
COAL – US
COAL – WORLD
The
41F Utility
E-Alert
is issued weekly and covers the coal-fired projects, regulations and other
information important to the suppliers. It is $950/yr. but is included in the
$3020
42EI
Utility Tracking System
which has data on every plant and project plus networking directories and many
other features.
India Flow Control and Treatment Revenues will reach $12 billion in 2017
Flow control and treatment revenues in India will grow by more than 8 percent
this year and reach $12 billion in 2017. The Indian economy is now the World’s 9th
largest. GDP growth is forecast to exceed 7 percent.
In the air segment, revenues of $2.7 billion will be achieved in 2017. The
leading product will be fabric filters which are used in air pollution control
in many industries. Most of the revenues of $801 million for electrostatic
precipitators will be generated in the power industry. However, the power sector
will spend little on flue gas desulfurization (FGD) and NOx
reduction.
Industrial valve and pump revenues will be widely spread across industries such
as power, refining, municipal water and wastewater, chemicals, food, mining and
pharmaceuticals.
Liquid treatment revenues will reach $2.6 billion in 2017 with each of the four
segments sharing the market fairly equally. The big change over the last few
years has been the increased market share for cross-flow membranes.
For more information on the Gas Turbine and Combined Cycle Supplier Program,
click on:
http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/markets/28-energy/610-59ei
For more information on the individual reports click on:
|
|
Bob McIlvaine
President
847-784-0012 ext. 112
rmcilvaine@mcilvainecompany.com
www.mcilvainecompany.com