Internal Data Search by Corporation Name

Data Search on:   A.H. Lundberg Associates

The titles below have an association with your requested corporate name

Wet vs. Dry ESP Webinar - Hot Topic Hour November 21, 2013

 

Revision Date:  11/21/2013

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, A.H. Lundberg Associates, Pollution Control Services, Siemens Energy, Dry ESP, Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, Maintenance


Why Choose Wet Emission Control Technology by Steve Jaasund, A.H. Lundberg - Hot Topic Hour November 21, 2013

 

Revision Date:  11/21/2013

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, A.H. Lundberg Associates, A.H. Lundberg Associates, Wet Electrostatic Precipitator


Why Choose Wet Emission Control Technology by Steve Jaasund, A.H. Lundberg - Hot Topic Hour November 21, 2013

 

Revision Date:  11/21/2013

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, A.H. Lundberg Associates, A.H. Lundberg Associates, Wet Electrostatic Precipitator


Wet ESPs for Boiler MACT Compliance by Steve Jaasund, A. H. Lundberg Associates - Hot Topic Hour April 4, 2013

The addition of a downstream wet ESP will be an attractive option for complying with the new MACT rules.

Revision Date:  4/4/2013

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, A.H. Lundberg Associates, MACT, Industrial Boiler, Wet Electrostatic Precipitator


Industrial Boiler MACT Impact and Control Options - Part 2 Webinar - Hot Topic Hour April 4, 2013

Final Boiler MACT Rule.

Revision Date:  4/4/2013

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, A.H. Lundberg Associates, Siemens Energy, Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, MACT, Industrial Boiler


Wet ESPs for Solid and Condensable Particulate by Steve Jaasund, A. H. Lundberg Associates - Hot Topic Hour April 26, 2012.

Steve discussed the effective control of solid and condensable particulates with wet ESPs.

Revision Date:  4/26/2012

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, A.H. Lundberg Associates, Electrostatic Precipitator - Wet, PM2.5


Particulate and Condensable Removal Webinar Recording - Hot Topic Hour April 26, 2012

Both wet precipitators and fluid bed absorbers followed by fabric filters can achieve low emissions of particulate and condensables. This was the message delivered by three speakers with over 100 years of experience in the industry.

Revision Date:  4/26/2012

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, Siemens Environmental Systems & Services, Babcock Power, A.H. Lundberg Associates, Electrostatic Precipitator - Wet, PM2.5, FGD


Draft of Article on Materials for WESPS for Air Pollution Control: October 2011

Stainless and FRP are the most popular casing materials 3/16” and ¼ “ 2205 and 316L are most popular. Significant market in power plants for SO3 and air toxic removal.

Revision Date:  8/20/2011

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, 322110 - Pulp Mills , Babcock & Wilcox, Siemens, Southern Environmental, A.H. Lundberg Associates, Industeel, Alstom, Stainless Steel, Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, Oil Fired Boiler, Air Quality, Corrosion, Fabrication


Wet ESPs for PM2.5 Control from Utility Boilers by Steve Jaasund, A. H. Lundberg Associates - Hot Topic Hour - May 12, 2011

Steve Jaasund discussed Wet ESPs for PM2.5 Control from Utility Boilers.

Revision Date:  5/12/2011

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, A.H. Lundberg Associates, Electrostatic Precipitator - Wet, PM2.5


Compliance Strategies for PM2.5 - Hot Topic Hour - May 12, 2011

 

Revision Date:  5/12/2011

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, ETS, A.H. Lundberg Associates, Electrostatic Precipitator - Wet, Circulating Dry Scrubber, Fabric Filter, PM2.5


Wet ESPs for Particulate Control Enhancement from Utility Boilers by Steve Jaasund, A. H. Lundberg Associates - Hot Topic Hour January 20, 2011

Wet ESPs for particulate control enhancement from utility boilers. Pros and cons of wet ESPs in the utility environment with emphasis on retrofit issues.

Revision Date:  1/20/2011

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, A.H. Lundberg Associates, Electrostatic Precipitator


Improving ESP Performance Webinar - Hot Topic Hour January 20, 2010

ESP Performance Improvement can be Substantial - Hot Topic Conclusion on January 20 There has been lots of focus on replacing ESPs with baghouses to meet upcoming regulations. The speakers in the Hot Topic Hour yesterday said there is an alternative. You can upgrade existing ESPs and achieve results which may satisfy future requirements. Dr. Yougen Kong, P.E., Technical Development Manager at Solvay Chemicals, Inc., told the attendees that “there is a better alternative to SO3 for conditioning electrostatic precipitators.” Trona addition system is simple and its capital cost is much lower than that of a SO3 production and injection system. Trona is relatively inexpensive and can be injected in several places. Mick Chambers, Southern Environmental, Inc, said that you can upgrade your ESP and with halogen-based additives in the coal, you can meet the particulate and mercury regulations. He showed that the SCA of recent installations has been relatively low and yet the performance high. So the footprint of a retrofit does not have to be large. When asked about the wet ESP using a fabric for the collection plate, Mick said that it is a good option and successful on industrial boilers and process applications. We were sorry to learn that John Caine passed away in a tractor accident last September. John had represented SEI in several of our previous Hot Topic Hours and has long been a contributor to the industry. Steve Jaasund, Manager Geoenergy Division A. H. Lundberg Associates, made a case for adding a wet ESP after the FGD system to meet the upcoming MACT regulations. In the discussion period it was speculated that the new mass monitoring requirements would make it more difficult for dry ESPs to meet emission limits. The wet ESP will eliminate the exceedance spikes associated with a stand-alone dry ESP. Paul Leanza of Pollution Control Services, Inc. indicated that many utilities have the opportunity to greatly improve performance of their existing precipitators. He indicated that 50 percent of the emissions occur during rapping (rapping reentrainment). These particles are relatively large and do not cause opacity spikes proportional to the mass increase. It was speculated that with mass monitoring this phenomenon will be an unpleasant surprise. Emissions will be higher with mass monitors than they were thought to be with opacity monitors and periodic stack testing. Ron Landreth of Albemarle was pleased to find that their brominated PAC actually improves precipitator performance whereas the non-brominated PAC may add to emissions. So it is worth considering brominated PAC to capture mercury and reduce particulate. Jean Bustard of ADA-ES (ADA Environmental Solutions LLC) related experience with a proprietary conditioning chemical which has performed well and does not impact mercury capture with PAC. The company offers another approach to conditioning hot side precipitators.

Revision Date:  1/20/2011

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, A.H. Lundberg Associates, Southern Environmental, Pollution Control Services, Albemarle, ADA-ES, Solvay Chemicals, Dry Sorbent Injection, Electrostatic Precipitator, Mercury