Reference Materials
NIST
The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has a BEES performance indicator that uses the same scope as the McIlvaine interpretation of environmental burden. It includes health along with environment.
Life Cycle Analysis
Environmental Burden analyses as well as other sustainability analyses include the whole life cycle. There are ISO standards which are designed to guide analysts in calculating the impacts in entirety.
Eco-Efficiency
The challenge of introducing a number of environmental factors is to create an evaluation system which provides equivalent impact of various different air, water, waste and health results. McIlvaine has created an “environmental burden index” to reduce all variables to one set of factors.
The term eco-efficiency was coined by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). It is based on the concept of creating more goods and services while using fewer resources and creating less waste and pollution.
According to the WBCSD definition, eco-efficiency is achieved through the delivery of "competitively priced goods and services that satisfy human needs and bring quality of life while progressively reducing environmental impacts of goods and resource intensity throughout the entire life-cycle to a level at least in line with the Earth's estimated carrying capacity."
This concept describes a vision for the production of economically valuable goods and services while reducing the ecological impacts of production. In other words, eco-efficiency means producing more with less.
According to the WBCSD, critical aspects of eco-efficiency are:
A reduction in the material intensity of goods or services;
A reduction in the energy intensity of goods or services;
Reduced dispersion of toxic materials;
Improved recyclability;
Maximum use of renewable resources;
Greater durability of products;
Increased service intensity of goods and services.
The reduction in ecological impacts translates into an increase in resource productivity, which in turn can create a competitive advantage.
The term “environmental burden” has been used in several contexts. One is to assess the burden of illness resulting from adverse environmental exposures. McIlvaine has appropriated this term to identify an index which reduces environmental, resource, and health burdens into one common index.
Eco-efficiency for various options can be determined by dividing the environmental burden reduction by the cost.
The United Nations definition of eco-efficiency is relatively narrow and the emphasis is on the environmental burden as a ratio to the dollar value added. A whole manual has been prepared that provides ratios and equivalents for fuels, greenhouse gases etc.
Seebalance
BASF has created Seebalance as a broader view than eco–efficiency. It takes into account the economy and society as well as the environment. The orientation is assessment of the impact of products. This is different than indices focused on corporate performance.
Dow Sustainability Index
This index is focused on corporate performance and only incidentally on products. The environmental sector is a small portion of the sustainability index. Economic issues carry a major weight. So this index is only marginally relevant
Sustainability with More Narrow Definitions
Sustainability is also used much more narrowly as witnessed by this analysis of a wastewater treatment plant where it is used interchangeably with environmental burden.
Sustainability Defined as Environmental Burden
An article on sustainability in hospitals focuses on energy reduction and air and water considerations. So it really is defining sustainability in the narrowest of terms.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
Economic issues including labor are in the index. (Trade unions have director positions)
The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) has pioneered the development of the
world’s most widely used sustainability reporting framework and is committed to
its continuous improvement and application worldwide. This framework sets out
the principles and indicators that organizations can use to measure and report
their economic, environmental, and social performance.
The cornerstone of the framework is the
Sustainability Reporting Guidelines.
The third version of the Guidelines – known as the G3 Guidelines - was
published in
2006,
and is a free public good. Other components of the framework include
Sector Supplements
(unique indicators for industry sectors) and
Protocols
(detailed reporting guidance) and
National Annexes
(unique country-level information).
Sustainability reports based on the GRI framework can be used to benchmark organizational performance with respect to laws, norms, codes, performance standards and voluntary initiatives; demonstrate organizational commitment to sustainable development; and compare organizational performance over time.
Voluntary Unaudited Reporting
GRI encourages the independent assurance of sustainability reports and the development of standards and guidelines for the assurance process to be followed by assurance providers. Independent assurance of a sustainability report is not a requirement for in accordance reporting.
Membership is Not Representative
Microsoft, Ford and GM are members but not a broad cross section.
To submit comments, please e-mail me at: rmcilvaine@mcilvainecompany.com
This report is for the exclusive use of the registered subscriber. Unauthorized distribution of content or use of the user name and password by others is prohibited.