Internal Data Search by Process

Data Search on:

Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Units with Air Cooled Condensers by Andrew Howell, Xcel Energy - Hot Topic Hour June 5, 2014

Are there CO2 considerations with various dry cooling and hybrid options? Andy Howell summarized the situation by stating that while ACC reduces water use it increases energy consumption, reduces plant output, and increases CO2 emissions.

Revision Date:  6/5/2014

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, Xcel Energy, Cooling Tower, Air Cooled Condenser, CO2, Wet Cooling, Dry Cooling


Dry vs. Wet Cooling Webinar - Hot Topic Hour June 5, 2014

The webinar covered many issues relative to cooling condensed steam in power plants. It was conducted in a discussion mode with a few presentations.

Revision Date:  6/5/2014

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, AECOM, Harfst and Associates, EPRI, Xcel Energy, Air Cooled Condenser, Cooling Tower, CO2, Wet Cooling, Dry Cooling


SPX Cooling Options

SPX offers the range of cooling options including dry, hybrid and wet. Energy and water usage are major considerations in selection

Revision Date:  6/4/2014

Tags:  SPX, Air Cooled Condenser, Cooling Tower, Schematic, Dry Cooling, Wet Cooling


Cost and Value of Water Use at Combined-Cycle Power Plants

This study compared water requirements, plant and cooling system capital and operating costs, and plant output and efficiency between plants equipped with wet and dry cooling. Comparisons were made for 500 MW, gas-fired, combined-cycle power plants at four sites, typical of environmental conditions in California. Results of the analysis include: • the use of dry cooling reduces plant water requirements by approximately 2,000 to 2,500 acre-feet per year, • The associated costs are: − increased plant capital cost of approximately $8 million to $27 million, or about 5% to 15% of the total plant cost, − potential reduction of energy production by about 13,000–56,000 megawatt hours (MWh) per year (1% to 2% of the total), − capacity reduction on hot days of 13 to 23 MW (4% to 6% of total), and − potential annual revenue reduction of about $1.5 to $3.0 million (1% to 2% of total)

Revision Date:  12/31/2013

Tags:  221112 - Fossil Fuel 化石燃料, California Energy Commission, Dry Cooling, Wet Cooling, Schematic, Cost, Cooling, Dry Cooling, Wet Cooling, USA